<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Conservative Front &#187; Bailout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservativefront.com/tag/bailout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservativefront.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 06:25:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More Bank Bailouts Equals More Kickbacks To Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2009/05/07/more-bank-bailouts-equals-more-kickbacks-to-congress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conservativefront.com/2009/05/07/more-bank-bailouts-equals-more-kickbacks-to-congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 03:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trenton Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy & Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain-Feingold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/2009/05/07/more-bank-bailouts-equals-more-kickbacks-to-congress/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The AP is carrying a story that would have been merely annoying had I not just watched the &#8220;Big Lie&#8221; video presentation from the good folks at iCaucus.org. The Independence Caucus has unveiled part of their research into the financial backroom dealing that keeps incumbents elected, wreaks havoc on our electoral system, and completely skirts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AP is carrying a <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090508/ap_on_bi_ge/us_banks_stress_tests" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090508/ap_on_bi_ge/us_banks_stress_tests?referer=');">story</a> that would have been merely annoying had I not just watched the &#8220;Big Lie&#8221; video presentation from the good folks at <a href="http://www.icaucus.org/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.icaucus.org/?referer=');">iCaucus.org</a>. The Independence Caucus has unveiled part of their research into the financial backroom dealing that keeps incumbents elected, wreaks havoc on our electoral system, and completely skirts around the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform Act.</p>
<p>Their research basically shows how 25 institutions (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, two auto companies, and 21 banks) have received 93% of all the TARP monies that were supposed to go to all the banks across the nation. One problem: the vast majority of the banks haven&#8217;t seen a red cent from the stimulus package. Out of over 8,500 banks, 21 got 93%, 553 got about 5%, and the rest has not been dispersed.</p>
<p>But you wouldn&#8217;t believe where a good portion of the money has gone&#8230;right back into the coffers of our Representatives, on both sides of the aisle. The money was contributed to the election campaigns of these people, and was almost evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans. Basically, it was payback for passing the stimulus bill. The folks at the <a href="http://www.icaucus.org/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.icaucus.org/?referer=');">Independence Caucus</a> explain how it works.</p>
<p>So now back to the story from the AP. Why did the Banks need to be stress tested? The government has never needed to &#8220;stress test&#8221; the banks before now. Banks have always been required by law to have stress tests conducted by independent auditors at regular intervals. But lo and behold, the government stress test, required by Congress, conveniently finds that the banks need additional government money, which in turn will fuel an additional round of campaign finance kickbacks.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s well past time to stop this madness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conservativefront.com/2009/05/07/more-bank-bailouts-equals-more-kickbacks-to-congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenn Beck: How We Got Here</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/10/06/glenn-beck-how-we-got-here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/10/06/glenn-beck-how-we-got-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trenton Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read Glenn Beck&#8217;s post here. I&#8217;ll follow his posts with links to each of his additions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read <a href="http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/16171/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/16171/?referer=');">Glenn Beck&#8217;s post</a> here. I&#8217;ll follow his posts with links to each of his additions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/10/06/glenn-beck-how-we-got-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cause And Effect</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/10/03/cause-and-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/10/03/cause-and-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trenton Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To borrow a phrase, this is &#8220;must see TV:&#8221; What bothers me most is that many of these Democrats are members of the Congressional Black Caucus, and it appears they are defending the criminal activities of Franklin Raines because he is black. And defending the policies of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac because they benefited [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To borrow a phrase, this is &#8220;must see TV:&#8221;</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_MGT_cSi7Rs&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_MGT_cSi7Rs&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>What bothers me most is that many of these Democrats are members of the Congressional Black Caucus, and it <em>appears</em> they are defending the criminal activities of Franklin Raines <em>because he is black</em>. And defending the policies of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac because they benefited <em>poor Blacks</em>.</p>
<p>I though such disgusting racism ended in the 1950&#8242;s. Racism is wrong no matter who does it.</p>
<p>At any rate, we have seen the labor of the Democrats come to fruition over the past several days. We know who is to blame, and we know who should be going to jail. What are we waiting for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/10/03/cause-and-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is Congress Smoking?</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/10/03/what-is-congress-smoking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/10/03/what-is-congress-smoking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trenton Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From CNN: Rep. Joe Knollenberg, R-Michigan, said he changed his vote to &#8220;yes&#8221; on Friday after calls to office changed after Monday&#8217;s rejection of the plan in the chamber. &#8220;A lot of people change their minds (about the bill) after seeing heartbreak in the streets,&#8221; he said. Heartbreak in the streets? What street, Wall Street? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/03/house.bailout/index.html#cnnSTCText" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/03/house.bailout/index.html_cnnSTCText?referer=');">CNN</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Rep. Joe Knollenberg, R-Michigan, said he changed his vote to &#8220;yes&#8221; on Friday after calls to office changed after Monday&#8217;s rejection of the plan in the chamber.</p>
<p>&#8220;A lot of people change their minds (about the bill) after seeing heartbreak in the streets,&#8221; he said.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.conservativefront.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/n579979193_788322_4238.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-201" title="n579979193_788322_4238" src="http://www.conservativefront.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/n579979193_788322_4238.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="216" /></a>Heartbreak in the streets? What street, Wall Street? Last I heard our reps were getting calls at <a href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/09/protests-against-bailout-bill.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/09/protests-against-bailout-bill.html?referer=');">99 to 1 against</a> passage of this boondoggle. Sen Bob Bennet&#8217;s office reported 1000 to 1 against.</p>
<p>The American people are telling Congress, &#8220;We don&#8217;t need your help on this. We think we can handle it on our own.&#8221; Of course, Congress hears &#8220;blah blah blah help blah.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/10/03/what-is-congress-smoking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

