<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Conservative Front</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservativefront.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservativefront.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Homeschool vs. Public School by Kristina Chapman</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2004/12/03/homeschool-vs-public-school/comment-page-1/#comment-1189</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/2004/12/03/homeschool-vs-public-school/#comment-1189</guid>
		<description>I can comment on so many levels with this.  I was the oldest of 8 kids and we were all homeschooled.  Although yes we did have quality education and I really don&#039;t feel we lacked on socialization as we participated with other local families in homeschool field trips as well as church functions.  I however hated it the whole time, I begged and pleaded to go to public school, and was given the reasons all the time as to why we didn&#039;t go.  I got my GED at 16, and started at the community college...I did obtain my assoc. degree and several of my siblings have gone onto obtain degrees and or go into the military.  
I am now a mother of 2 and both of my children go to public school as I vowed they would never be put through what I endured.  I am involved in the school and even though I work f/t I help in their classrooms occationally and also work with the teachers when anything comes up, such as they struggle with something.  I am a local director of a non-profit national agency.  I feel so much of this whole debate can come down to if you are invested and take an interest in your kids.  Many kids that have gone through the public school system are amazing kids and not outstanding adults...largely due to their parents being involved in their education and their lives.  Both my kids are near the tops of their classes...and they both love their schools.  Their cousins(of same age), my siblings kids are both behind my kids in many different areas, even though they are the focus of their classes, compared to my kids who are &quot;just one in a group of 25&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can comment on so many levels with this.  I was the oldest of 8 kids and we were all homeschooled.  Although yes we did have quality education and I really don&#8217;t feel we lacked on socialization as we participated with other local families in homeschool field trips as well as church functions.  I however hated it the whole time, I begged and pleaded to go to public school, and was given the reasons all the time as to why we didn&#8217;t go.  I got my GED at 16, and started at the community college&#8230;I did obtain my assoc. degree and several of my siblings have gone onto obtain degrees and or go into the military.<br />
I am now a mother of 2 and both of my children go to public school as I vowed they would never be put through what I endured.  I am involved in the school and even though I work f/t I help in their classrooms occationally and also work with the teachers when anything comes up, such as they struggle with something.  I am a local director of a non-profit national agency.  I feel so much of this whole debate can come down to if you are invested and take an interest in your kids.  Many kids that have gone through the public school system are amazing kids and not outstanding adults&#8230;largely due to their parents being involved in their education and their lives.  Both my kids are near the tops of their classes&#8230;and they both love their schools.  Their cousins(of same age), my siblings kids are both behind my kids in many different areas, even though they are the focus of their classes, compared to my kids who are &#8220;just one in a group of 25&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Independence Caucus by Paul Szemanczky</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/10/26/the-independence-caucus/comment-page-1/#comment-1131</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Szemanczky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 16:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/?p=251#comment-1131</guid>
		<description>Well said and argued correctly, Trent. Keep up the solid foundation of seeking the truth. Good voices carry on. &quot;Deeper than the silence of death is the fear of forgetting.&quot; (Gordon Livingston MD from &quot;Only Spring&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said and argued correctly, Trent. Keep up the solid foundation of seeking the truth. Good voices carry on. &#8220;Deeper than the silence of death is the fear of forgetting.&#8221; (Gordon Livingston MD from &#8220;Only Spring&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Homeschool vs. Public School by Chris Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2004/12/03/homeschool-vs-public-school/comment-page-1/#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/2004/12/03/homeschool-vs-public-school/#comment-1118</guid>
		<description>Before a parent decides to home school educate or public school educate I think they need to understand their own reasoning. If it is just to force the student into a radical concept then they are doing the student an injustice! However, if it is to provide the best education to the student and allow them to grow into responsible and productive human beings then which ever way they choose is best for them. Some children need the extra guidance of public school. Some do not, and will slowly slide off into bad behavior because of boredom or frustration. We chose a combination of the two alternatives and are very proud of the way our children have established themselves in meaningful careers and are happy in their adult lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before a parent decides to home school educate or public school educate I think they need to understand their own reasoning. If it is just to force the student into a radical concept then they are doing the student an injustice! However, if it is to provide the best education to the student and allow them to grow into responsible and productive human beings then which ever way they choose is best for them. Some children need the extra guidance of public school. Some do not, and will slowly slide off into bad behavior because of boredom or frustration. We chose a combination of the two alternatives and are very proud of the way our children have established themselves in meaningful careers and are happy in their adult lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Gay Marriage Will Affect Traditional Marriages by reed</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2009/06/04/how-gay-marriage-will-affect-traditional-marriages/comment-page-1/#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator>reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/2009/06/04/how-gay-marriage-will-affect-traditional-marriages/#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>Gay marriage is wrong and unnatural. From the beginning it was Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve!  IF we were meant to marry or be attracted to our own gender we would all be male or we would all be female. It defeats the purpose of life! Why do we all have procreative abilities if we weren&#039;t meant to marry the opposite gender and procreate. Gay marriage does not make sense. If the first two humans on earth were males or both females none of us would be here! Now a male and and female makes sense cause can two males or two females have children nope they can&#039;t. Hmmmm makes sense to me. :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gay marriage is wrong and unnatural. From the beginning it was Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve!  IF we were meant to marry or be attracted to our own gender we would all be male or we would all be female. It defeats the purpose of life! Why do we all have procreative abilities if we weren&#8217;t meant to marry the opposite gender and procreate. Gay marriage does not make sense. If the first two humans on earth were males or both females none of us would be here! Now a male and and female makes sense cause can two males or two females have children nope they can&#8217;t. Hmmmm makes sense to me. <img src='http://www.conservativefront.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rethinking The 17th Amendment by Thomas Mick</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2009/05/13/rethinking-the-17th-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 23:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/?p=388#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>The 17th Amendment is a fraud and only the States can make things right... OR a Constitutionalist President with some testicular fortitude!

 

This will not be an easy process due to the extent the progressives/globalists have damaged our nation, brainwashed generations of Americans, and weakened our institutions. The alternative however is abject slavery and the surrender of America itself to the destiny we all now see looming before us.

 

Article V of the Constitution articulates the manner in which the Constitution can be amended:

 

&quot;The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.&quot;

 

In this Article there are two notable exceptions to the normal amendment process:

 

&quot;Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.&quot;

 

The first exception dealt with slaves and became moot after 1808; the second dealt with the Suffrage of the States in the Senate.

 

Article V, last clause states:

 

&quot;... and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate .&quot;

 

Since the Suffrage of the Senate was by constitutional definition the legislature, ALL States must have adopted the Amendment, not just 36. They did not approve this Amendment unanimously and thereby those not in agreement were deprived of their representation in the Senate.

 

The States must take back their power in the Congress by electing their lawful Senators and DEMAND that they replace the imposters currently there; or a President is elected that recognizes this fraud, exposes it to the States, vacates the imposters from the Senate; replacing them with lawfully selected Senators sent by the States.

 

The new Congress should then immediately move to remove Obama from the Oval Office by any means necessary except impeachment, since he was never lawfully President. Since he isn&#039;t qualified to be President, everything he&#039;s signed, every executive order he&#039;s issued, every action he has made as President is null and void. Marine Guards should take him into custody and hold him for trial for usurpation, sedition, treason, criminal trespass, and a myriad of other charges the new Attorney General could charge.

 

The Judiciary is also contaminated by the fraud since it is the Senate that must confirm all judicial appointments; all judges must be replaced and past decisions made by activist judges since 1915 reviewed by the new judiciary for constitutional intent and either retained or thrown out. The fallout just from this one action will bring the world down upon the progressives as they have been using the judiciary to &quot;pass&quot; legislation that Congress and the States refuse to. Read Article I, section 1 of the Constitution for clarification regarding this principle and law.

 

All treaties since 1915, when the first Senators popularly elected were seated should be deemed null and void as a product of fraud since they were ratified by an unlawfully assembled Senate.

 

The new lawfully assembled Senate must then get to work undoing the damage caused by the fraud by first restoring proper rules for the Senate, then confirming the replacement Justices, judges, Administrative appointments, and other governmental functions of the Senate.

 

This &quot;Amendment&quot; must be repudiated, not repealed. It is improper to repeal something put into place unlawfully and it leaves in place all the damage of the fraud. Then, all treaties, amendments, Federal Judiciary confirmations, administrative confirmations, Acts, Bills, Resolutions, and all other actions that the Senate took part in since 1915 MUST be reversed as much as is practical since it is all the product of fraud.

 

Things that are constitutional in scope and beneficial to our nation must be passed, ratified, or confirmed by a LAWFULLY constituted Senate; one that represents the State Legislatures as required in Article I, section 3 of the Constitution.

 

This action will be radical and even revolutionary to most of the people of this nation; after all, few are even alive today that lived in an America without the 17th Amendment and those that are were too young to even know life before it. May 2013 will be a century under this fraud, that is how long it has taken to rot our nation from within, reversing it will be alien and frightening to many but it is necessary and proper in order to restore the Republic. Much of the suffering we are enduring and will continue to endure was a direct result of this fraud.

 

Then and only then will the Republic be restored to its former self and the damage done by the enemies of liberty vanquished in this land.

If we are not willing to do this, the globalists have won and they know it. There is nothing outside their reach now that the people of this country no longer cherish their own liberty or even understand what it is anymore.

 
Are there enough Americans who believe in America left to restore it?

 

Thomas Mick

thomas.mick@hotmail.com
Dundee, Oregon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 17th Amendment is a fraud and only the States can make things right&#8230; OR a Constitutionalist President with some testicular fortitude!</p>
<p>This will not be an easy process due to the extent the progressives/globalists have damaged our nation, brainwashed generations of Americans, and weakened our institutions. The alternative however is abject slavery and the surrender of America itself to the destiny we all now see looming before us.</p>
<p>Article V of the Constitution articulates the manner in which the Constitution can be amended:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.&#8221;</p>
<p>In this Article there are two notable exceptions to the normal amendment process:</p>
<p>&#8220;Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.&#8221;</p>
<p>The first exception dealt with slaves and became moot after 1808; the second dealt with the Suffrage of the States in the Senate.</p>
<p>Article V, last clause states:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate .&#8221;</p>
<p>Since the Suffrage of the Senate was by constitutional definition the legislature, ALL States must have adopted the Amendment, not just 36. They did not approve this Amendment unanimously and thereby those not in agreement were deprived of their representation in the Senate.</p>
<p>The States must take back their power in the Congress by electing their lawful Senators and DEMAND that they replace the imposters currently there; or a President is elected that recognizes this fraud, exposes it to the States, vacates the imposters from the Senate; replacing them with lawfully selected Senators sent by the States.</p>
<p>The new Congress should then immediately move to remove Obama from the Oval Office by any means necessary except impeachment, since he was never lawfully President. Since he isn&#8217;t qualified to be President, everything he&#8217;s signed, every executive order he&#8217;s issued, every action he has made as President is null and void. Marine Guards should take him into custody and hold him for trial for usurpation, sedition, treason, criminal trespass, and a myriad of other charges the new Attorney General could charge.</p>
<p>The Judiciary is also contaminated by the fraud since it is the Senate that must confirm all judicial appointments; all judges must be replaced and past decisions made by activist judges since 1915 reviewed by the new judiciary for constitutional intent and either retained or thrown out. The fallout just from this one action will bring the world down upon the progressives as they have been using the judiciary to &#8220;pass&#8221; legislation that Congress and the States refuse to. Read Article I, section 1 of the Constitution for clarification regarding this principle and law.</p>
<p>All treaties since 1915, when the first Senators popularly elected were seated should be deemed null and void as a product of fraud since they were ratified by an unlawfully assembled Senate.</p>
<p>The new lawfully assembled Senate must then get to work undoing the damage caused by the fraud by first restoring proper rules for the Senate, then confirming the replacement Justices, judges, Administrative appointments, and other governmental functions of the Senate.</p>
<p>This &#8220;Amendment&#8221; must be repudiated, not repealed. It is improper to repeal something put into place unlawfully and it leaves in place all the damage of the fraud. Then, all treaties, amendments, Federal Judiciary confirmations, administrative confirmations, Acts, Bills, Resolutions, and all other actions that the Senate took part in since 1915 MUST be reversed as much as is practical since it is all the product of fraud.</p>
<p>Things that are constitutional in scope and beneficial to our nation must be passed, ratified, or confirmed by a LAWFULLY constituted Senate; one that represents the State Legislatures as required in Article I, section 3 of the Constitution.</p>
<p>This action will be radical and even revolutionary to most of the people of this nation; after all, few are even alive today that lived in an America without the 17th Amendment and those that are were too young to even know life before it. May 2013 will be a century under this fraud, that is how long it has taken to rot our nation from within, reversing it will be alien and frightening to many but it is necessary and proper in order to restore the Republic. Much of the suffering we are enduring and will continue to endure was a direct result of this fraud.</p>
<p>Then and only then will the Republic be restored to its former self and the damage done by the enemies of liberty vanquished in this land.</p>
<p>If we are not willing to do this, the globalists have won and they know it. There is nothing outside their reach now that the people of this country no longer cherish their own liberty or even understand what it is anymore.</p>
<p>Are there enough Americans who believe in America left to restore it?</p>
<p>Thomas Mick</p>
<p><a href="mailto:thomas.mick@hotmail.com">thomas.mick@hotmail.com</a><br />
Dundee, Oregon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rethinking The 17th Amendment by Thomas Mick</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2009/05/13/rethinking-the-17th-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 23:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/?p=388#comment-1080</guid>
		<description>The 17th Amendment was not lawfully adopted. See: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150321044660953</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 17th Amendment was not lawfully adopted. See: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150321044660953" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150321044660953&amp;referer=');">http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150321044660953</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Manifesto by Dominic Mccrabb</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Mccrabb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/manifesto/#comment-978</guid>
		<description>Hi, I think your website might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your blog in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, superb blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I think your website might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your blog in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, superb blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Manifesto by Trenton Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>Trenton Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/manifesto/#comment-944</guid>
		<description>Suzann,

Yes, I&#039;ve been somewhat distracted lately. My sincere apologies to you, and to all my readers. I have been busy working to finish my BS in Political Science; I have finally finished with an emphasis in Political Philosophy, and a minor in History.

Thanks for reading and hanging in there. More to come soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suzann,</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;ve been somewhat distracted lately. My sincere apologies to you, and to all my readers. I have been busy working to finish my BS in Political Science; I have finally finished with an emphasis in Political Philosophy, and a minor in History.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading and hanging in there. More to come soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Manifesto by Suzann Mcdearman</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzann Mcdearman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/manifesto/#comment-942</guid>
		<description>I used to love reading your blog, but lately it&#039;s been a little boring. I&#039;ll still read it though =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to love reading your blog, but lately it&#8217;s been a little boring. I&#8217;ll still read it though =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Homeschool vs. Public School by Kitchen Cupboards</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2004/12/03/homeschool-vs-public-school/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>Kitchen Cupboards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 05:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/2004/12/03/homeschool-vs-public-school/#comment-940</guid>
		<description>i was home schooled when i was still very young and i have to stay that it is also a great way to educate your kids &quot;`,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was home schooled when i was still very young and i have to stay that it is also a great way to educate your kids &#8220;`,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

