Category: ‘Campaigns’

NY Times Spiked Major Obama-ACORN Story Before Election

May 18, 2009 Posted by Trenton Hansen

How are Americans supposed to make an informed decision, if the means whereby information is disseminated to them is corrupted?

The Freedom of the Press never included the right or the privilege to deceive the people, either by outright lying to them, or withholding the truth from them. The NY Times is routinely guilty of both. In this case, it may have influenced the election. I would venture to say that, if this story was published prior to the election, we would have seen more people like Anita Moncrief standing up.

This is how the liberal Democrats win elections: they lie, cheat, and steal in order to win, because they know two things, 1) the American People wouldn’t vote for them with full disclosure, and 2) if they can win before the truth comes out, it will largely be too late to stop them.

Gateway Pundit has more.

Share

Another Anti-War Fake Marine

May 15, 2009 Posted by Trenton Hansen

Michelle Malkin has more on her site.

Are the Democrats so blinded by their hatred of Conservatives and the GOP they cannot tell a phony when they see one?

So, let’s see…voter fraud, tax cheats, imposters, liars…can anyone find me an honest Democrat?

Share

Specter’s Opposition Thins

May 14, 2009 Posted by Trenton Hansen

Arlen Specter’s leading opponent in the Democratic Primary in Pennsylvania has dropped out of the race, according to an AP story.

That puts Specter a little closer to earning the Democratic nomination for his seat in the next election, and facing the new Republican challenger, Pat Toomey. In an April 24th poll by USA Today, Toomey was leading Specter by 20%.

If the Democrats in Pennsylvania cannot field a candidate able to defeat Specter, Toomey will likely win the election.

Would any of this be happening if we repealed the 17th Amendment?

Share

More Bank Bailouts Equals More Kickbacks To Congress

May 7, 2009 Posted by Trenton Hansen

The AP is carrying a story that would have been merely annoying had I not just watched the “Big Lie” video presentation from the good folks at iCaucus.org. The Independence Caucus has unveiled part of their research into the financial backroom dealing that keeps incumbents elected, wreaks havoc on our electoral system, and completely skirts around the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform Act.

Their research basically shows how 25 institutions (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, two auto companies, and 21 banks) have received 93% of all the TARP monies that were supposed to go to all the banks across the nation. One problem: the vast majority of the banks haven’t seen a red cent from the stimulus package. Out of over 8,500 banks, 21 got 93%, 553 got about 5%, and the rest has not been dispersed.

But you wouldn’t believe where a good portion of the money has gone…right back into the coffers of our Representatives, on both sides of the aisle. The money was contributed to the election campaigns of these people, and was almost evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans. Basically, it was payback for passing the stimulus bill. The folks at the Independence Caucus explain how it works.

So now back to the story from the AP. Why did the Banks need to be stress tested? The government has never needed to “stress test” the banks before now. Banks have always been required by law to have stress tests conducted by independent auditors at regular intervals. But lo and behold, the government stress test, required by Congress, conveniently finds that the banks need additional government money, which in turn will fuel an additional round of campaign finance kickbacks.

It’s well past time to stop this madness.

Share

ACORN Spokesman Accuses Glenn Beck Of Racism, Gets Kicked Out Of Studio

May 7, 2009 Posted by Trenton Hansen

Hot Air Blog has the videos.

If it were up to me, ACORN would be outlawed, for no other reason than the fact that they hired this Mafia mouthpiece from Chicago. The guy is a horrible liar–completely unbelievable.

Then, he has the gall to tell Glenn, “You’re just afraid of Black people.” Glenn tosses the guy out on his butt.

My favorite part is the classic, liberal double-speak (paraphrasing): “We didn’t commit voter fraud, our employees did.”

HELLO!?!

Share

The Independence Caucus Research Reveal Tomorrow

May 6, 2009 Posted by Trenton Hansen

The Independence Caucus will be releasing the findings of their research into the TARP Funds money trail. This from Monte Bateman of iCaucus:

The Independence Caucus has been engaged for some time in a research effort to show the connection between ALL of the Senators and Congressmen who voted in favor of the bailout AND the recipients of the TARP funds. We will be doing our “Research Reveal” broadcast on Thursday, May 7th at 7pm MDT, 8pm Central on http://www.Justin.TV/icaucus and we invite you to come and watch and then report on anything you find blog worthy. Here’s is a preview of our findings:

  1. In 2006, the public approval rating for our Congress was a meager 16%, and yet in spite of the low rating, 94% of all incumbents were reelected.
  2. In 2008, the public approval rating sank to an all-time single digit low of 9%, and even after the American public registered 1000 to 1 against the bailout in phone calls and emails, 96% of all incumbents were reelected, AND 98% of all incumbents who voted in favor of the bailout were reelected.
  3. With 8,533 financial institutions in the United States, only 25 institutions (21 banks, 2 car companies and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) received 93% of the TARP funds.
  4. Those 25 institutions are responsible for 60% to 70% of ALL the total campaign funds of every single Senator and Congressman who voted in favor of the bailout.
  5. Those same 25 institutions are remarkably bipartisan with donations on both sides of the isle being about equal, ranging between 47% to 53%.
  6. Thursday during our broadcast we’ll be naming 12 Congressmen and Senators (6 Republicans and 6 Democrats) who are some of the largest recipients of donations from those 25 institutions. Some of the names will surprise you. While no one will be amazed that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are well fed from that trough, however one may not expect Bob Bennett’s, or John Boehner’s names to appear on that same list with campaign receipts just as high or higher than those the Democrats receive. Want to see where John McCain and Barack Obama stand in total donations? Stay tuned.
  7. In our research we go way beyond what the media and the FEC reports for campaign donations, and have peeled back 10 different layers through which those 25 institutions are able to give those candidates way beyond the “maximum contribution” AND we expose the “multi-donor clause” which allows those 25 institutions to double down and donate twice as much as you can, to every single candidate each election phase.


We look forward to your involvement in this, and if you are willing to help promote this event through Facebook, on your blogs and anywhere else you can, your help is greatly appreciated. If you would like to see more information, you can go to the following sites:

http://www.icaucus.org (watch Article II part 1 to start and advance from there–takes about an hour and forty minutes to get through all the videos, so perhaps just watch a couple at a time as you have the time.)

http://www.tellyourneighbor.com/icaucus/ – this was the early results of our research; gives a little more background on the seven points I just made in this email.

http://www.tellyourneighbor.com/icaucus/invite/ – Invite others by sending them to this page.

Again, please tune into http://www.justin.tv/icaucus to view, and if you want to participate in the conversation in the chat board, you’ll need to register for a Justin.TV account (registration for Justin.TV is recommended before Thursday so we don’t crash any servers).

I really hope this event becomes the kick-off moment for real change in Washington D.C., instead of Barak Obama’s phony status quo change.

Share

Chris Simcox Announces Run For Senate Against John McCain

April 26, 2009 Posted by Trenton Hansen

Chris Simcox, Founder of the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps, has announced his candidacy for US Senate, challenging John McCain for the seat McCain has held since 1987. McCain took a lot of heat during his run for the Presidency because of his pro-amnesty stance on immigration. His lukewarm support of immigration reform was viewed by some as a way to court Hispanic voters, but was seen by Conservative Republicans as a sell-out of American sovereignty for political gain and it, among other things, cost him the election.

The video below is Chris’s formal announcement. The Conservative Front wishes Chris well in his run for the Senate. Time to send the RINOs packing.

Share

It Has Already Begun

November 5, 2008 Posted by Trenton Hansen

Folks, Rush called it.

He predicted an Obama win would usher in a new Chicago gangland-style thugocracy. Most people won’t want to hear it, and will refuse to believe it or will call it crazy talk. Nevertheless, the two thugs in the video below are Obama supporters. These are the kind of people that Obama has befriended over the last 20 years, and the kind of people that are attracted to his campaign.

These are people who have not voted before because only white people were running. These are people who are not afraid to use violence to get what they want.

Don’t misunderstand me–these are not the only kind of people that Obama brings in. But the fact that people like this feel at home with Obama is very troubling.

Share

A Letter From A Friend

November 4, 2008 Posted by Trenton Hansen

My good friend Nathan Walker has penned an eloquent warning against voting for Obama.

I think it deserves a wider reading, and with his blessing I am posting it here.

Hi XXXXX,

I have followed some of the political dialog back and forth between you and several friends, and have decided, until now, to stay out of the political discussion. (I had intended to write an article called something like “The Top 5 Reasons I WON’T Be Voting for Obama,” but I ran out of time.)

I have been concerned, surprised, and disappointed with the rancor of some of the posts–on both sides. Such things ought not to be. Feeling passionately about something usually means one can advocate and defend a position on principles, not simply spew forth bitter diatribes against those with whom he or she disagrees.

When you and I awake tomorrow, we will have opportunity, if not already taken, to vote. I feel I have a moral obligation, as a matter of both citizenry and religion, to vote for those who will oppose Socialism in any form, and oppose the denigration and destruction of the family, the advocacy of gay marriage, the removal of religion from public life, and the taking of life by abortion. All other issues are secondary. All foreign policy disputes, financial crises, and energy disputes can be resolved by an understanding of, and return to, the principles clearly delineated in the inspired Constitution, and other explanatory supporting documents.

To vote for ANY candidate as a punishment for the real or perceived crimes of his predecessor is naive in the extreme. Those who sow the seeds of “voting against” may reap the bitter harvest of “stuck with.”

I have spoken several times over the past few weeks with members of my faith who say they think socialism is a viable, even preferable system to our current social and economic systems. However, this denotes a lack of understanding. Wise leaders and prophets, especially throughout the past century, have warned strongly and repeatedly about the grave dangers of socialism in any form. Recent warnings have been stronger and more frequent. All who profess to follow a prophet have an obligation to be familiar with their words as they pertain to this issue.

I urge you to watch the two video clips by Ezra Taft Benson you’ll find linked from this page: http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/11/02/ezra-taft-benson-on-socialism/. There may be information there that you have not yet considered.

Any candidate who says he or she will “make things all better,” whether through universal health care, “redistribution of wealth,” social programs for the poor, or any “fairness doctrine,” are singing the same tune sung by another, eons ago, when he said; “… I will redeem all mankind, that one soul shall not be lost, and surely I will do it; wherefore give me thine honor.” (Moses 4:1). True equality is agency–the power to choose freely. The enemy of equal opportunity is egalitarianism–equality of outcome. Beware any who set this heresy forth as the American Dream.

It is not.

I admire your conviction and loyalty. I am not thrilled with either of the two major candidates. One of them, however, has consistently and openly declared his support for, and determination to enact, policies in opposition to truth and liberty; policies which reinforce socialism, abortion, gay marriage, removal of religion from public life, intrusive and coercive environmental policies, and redistribution of wealth. I cannot, in good conscience, support such a candidate.

I urge you, and all who read this post, to consider carefully, without bitterness for the mistakes of past leaders, and without the naivete that assumes any change is for the better. Then choose. You are, after all, free. Choose the person most likely to help keep you so.

Your faithful friend,

Nathan

Personally, I believe that voting for Obama because “he’s better than Bush” is a fool’s errand. Nathan says it much better than I would.

Share

Palin Vindicated

November 3, 2008 Posted by Trenton Hansen

The AP carried a story tonight concerning Sarah Palin and the “troopergate” probe. Of course Mrs. Palin was completely exonerated of all charges. In fact, she was not only exonerated, the state personnel board found that there was “no probable cause to believe that the governor, or any other state official, violated the Alaska Executive Ethics Act in connection with these matters.”

The Democrats should probably find another method of winning elections. The politics of personal destruction that Bill Clinton introduced may work the first few times, but eventualy the people will clue in to those tactics. They may one day find mobs armed with pitchforks at their collective doors.

Alaskan authorities ought to prosecute Stephen Branchflower for ethics violations. Branchflower is the Democratic legislator who insisted on the investigation, and was obviously paid off by the state trooper around whom this story revolves. At the very least he ought to be unseated for attempting to interfere with an election.

Tonight, all the idiots who used this as evidence of Palin’s unsuitability are eating crow. And they should be.

Share