<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Conservative Front &#187; John McCain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservativefront.com/category/john-mccain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservativefront.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 06:25:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Unconstitutional Liberalism</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/05/17/unconstitutional-liberalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/05/17/unconstitutional-liberalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trenton Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideology & Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FairTax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto Protocol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Fascists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, it&#8217;s a strange thing. The liberal voices who insist that we must change the way we do things always point to either Europe or Great Britain as models for how we should behave. The problem is that this is not a comparison of apples to apples. Take gas consumption for example. The liberal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, it&#8217;s a strange thing. The liberal voices who insist that we must change the way we do things always point to either Europe or Great Britain as models for how we should behave. The problem is that this is not a comparison of apples to apples.</p>
<p>Take gas consumption for example. The liberal fascists wants us to reduce our consumption of gas to match that of Europe. They think we should be paying the same prices for gas as they do in Europe, somewhere around 10 thousand dollars a gallon. Europeans actually have the lowest prices for gas on the planet; their sympathetic attitude toward radical jihadists qualifies them for the Al-Qaeda employee discount. Once they add in the taxes, well, you can see what happens.</p>
<p>The taxes are part of why Europeans don&#8217;t drive much. It&#8217;s also the reason they can eat really heavy, fat-filled foods and not have heart attacks. Seriously&#8211;my friends who have lived in Europe tell me that they don&#8217;t offer fat-free foods in their supermarkets. Why should they? Riding a bike everywhere burns off the calories pretty quick. Taxes are how the Europeans control behavior.</p>
<p>The liberals here in America think they are going to institute similar measures to control us. What they don&#8217;t understand is that Europeans have a long tradition of being second-class citizens. They lived for many years under the rule of kings, long after we threw our king out. Some gradually managed to put together new forms of government under Presidents or Prime Ministers, but they insisted that these new governments continue to act like kings. The Brits even kept their king around, just as a reminder.</p>
<p>The liberals want us to sign on to the Kyoto Protocol to reduce our carbon emissions, like Europe. Trouble is, high energy taxes were already forcing them to use less gas by rarely driving and were  were forcing them to forgo air conditioning. Remember the heat wave France had a couple of years ago, where thousands of people died of heat exhaustion in their own homes because they couldn&#8217;t afford to pay for air conditioning? The Europeans were already using far less energy than we do as a whole, and they still can&#8217;t meet their Kyoto requirements. What on earth makes the crazy liberals think the results will be different here?</p>
<p>We probably can do better than we are&#8211;we could lose some weight, we could stop smoking, or ride a bike more often. But we don&#8217;t need government using tax policy to control our behavior (the <a href="http://www.fairtax.org" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.fairtax.org?referer=');">FairTax</a> would fix all that). In fact, our traditions say that government shouldn&#8217;t be dictating how we live our lives, as long as we aren&#8217;t hurting others. The Kyoto Protocol, if ratified, would become part of the law of the land equal to the Constitution&#8211;a Constitutional mandate for Government to control our behavior. Cheers to George W. Bush for rejecting it, and Jeers to John McCain for wanting to sign it.</p>
<p>The liberals want us to save the planet, drive less, lose weight, stop smoking, and live closely packed together in a few big cities, rather than a lot of little towns. They don&#8217;t want us to have guns. They want us to be only <em>fashionably</em> religious. They want us to be second-class citizens ruled by an elite monarchial government. Most of all, though, they want to be King.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/05/17/unconstitutional-liberalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaffetz Campaign Launches Grass Roots Effort</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/05/13/chaffetz-campaign-launches-grass-roots-effort/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/05/13/chaffetz-campaign-launches-grass-roots-effort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trenton Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideology & Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grass Roots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain-Feingold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jason Chaffetz kicked off the next phase of his campaign today. Jennifer Scott, Chaffetz&#8217;s Campaign Manager, said today that they are kicking off &#8220;the biggest grass roots effort in the history of [Utah's] Third District.&#8221; The campaign plans to take advantage of new technologies to help distribute news and information, similar to the methods used [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jasonforcongress.com" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.jasonforcongress.com?referer=');">Jason Chaffetz</a> kicked off the next phase of his campaign today. Jennifer Scott, Chaffetz&#8217;s Campaign Manager, said today that they are kicking off &#8220;the biggest grass roots effort in the history of [Utah's] Third District.&#8221;</p>
<p>The campaign plans to take advantage of new technologies to help distribute news and information, similar to the methods used by <a href="http://www.ronpaul2008.com/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.ronpaul2008.com/?referer=');">Ron Paul</a> and Mitt Romney in their respective bids for the Presidency. Ron Paul has demonstrated that such a movement can be powerful. He remains in the race despite insurmountable odds largely because of the support he gets from his on-line efforts. </p>
<p>Jason has an uphill battle on his hands as he faces Chris Cannon in the June 24th primary. Cannon isn&#8217;t going down easily; he has the advantages of name recognition, federal monies reserved for incumbents, and the infamous legacy of John McCain&#8211;the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCain-Feingold" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCain-Feingold?referer=');">McCain-Feingold Act</a>, which places restrictions on advertising for candidates by supporters in the month previous to an election. But those restrictions don&#8217;t apply to the media, so any media coverage Cannon can get is basically unrestricted advertising.</p>
<p>But Jason is not to be underestimated. He pulled off a stunning upset at the convention, and I&#8217;m betting that the mood for change is contagious; people want to see new faces and new ideas in Congress, and have demonstrated quite forcefully already that they are tired of Republicans acting like Liberal Democrats.</p>
<p>Chris Cannon says we shouldn&#8217;t change the status quo when it&#8217;s working so well for Utah. He has earned the respect of the movers and shakers in Washington D.C., and it would be foolish to give that up. From my personal perspective, the fact that Mr. Cannon claims to have the respect of Washington insiders speaks volumes. I mean, what does it say when some of the most corrupt, crooked politicians in the country respect you? Ultimately, it is the respect of the people, not of Washington politicians that Cannon should be seeking. That seems to be one of many differences between Jason Chaffetz and Chris Cannon. Please tell your friends about Jason Chaffetz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/05/13/chaffetz-campaign-launches-grass-roots-effort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney Steps Aside</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/02/07/romney-steps-aside/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/02/07/romney-steps-aside/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trenton Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statesmanship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/02/07/romney-steps-aside/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Class. That&#8217;s all there is to it. Mitt Romney has more class in his little finger than John McCain and Mike Huckabee can muster together. His speech to CPAC demonstrates who the real American Statesman is. Just a parting &#8220;stick in the eye&#8221; to either McCain or Huckabee&#8230;buy one now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Class. That&#8217;s all there is to it. Mitt Romney has more class in his little finger than John McCain and Mike Huckabee can muster together.</p>
<p>His <a href="http://www.section134.com/2008/02/07/mitt-romneys-speech-to-cpac/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.section134.com/2008/02/07/mitt-romneys-speech-to-cpac/?referer=');">speech to CPAC</a> demonstrates who the <em>real</em> American Statesman is.</p>
<p>Just a parting &#8220;stick in the eye&#8221; to either McCain or Huckabee&#8230;<a href="http://www.cafepress.com/buy/romney+blame/-/pv_design_prod/p_storeid.225190673/pNo_225190673/id_25868606/opt_/pg_/c_/fpt_" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.cafepress.com/buy/romney+blame/-/pv_design_prod/p_storeid.225190673/pNo_225190673/id_25868606/opt_/pg_/c_/fpt?referer=');">buy one</a> now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/02/07/romney-steps-aside/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It’s Super Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/02/05/its-super-tuesday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/02/05/its-super-tuesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trenton Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/02/05/its-super-tuesday/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The day we find out if John McCain really does have the support of Conservative Republicans that he claims to have, or if Mitt Romney can surge into a strong position that demonstrates the strength of the anti-McCain movement. Go Mitt!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The day we find out if John McCain really does have the support of Conservative Republicans that he claims to have, or if Mitt Romney can surge into a strong position that demonstrates the strength of the anti-McCain movement.</p>
<p>Go Mitt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/02/05/its-super-tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney Handily Wins Maine Caucuses</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/02/02/romney-handily-wins-maine-caucuses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/02/02/romney-handily-wins-maine-caucuses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 03:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trenton Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/02/02/romney-handily-wins-maine-caucuses/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the recent polling numbers: 68% of Precincts reporting: Romney 52% McCain 21% Ron Paul 19% Mike Huckabee 6% Undecided 2% I think the fun point of interest is Ron Paul&#8217;s point spread over Mike Huckabee. That&#8217;s got to be painful for the Huckabillies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the recent polling numbers:</p>
<p>68% of Precincts reporting:<br />
Romney 52%<br />
McCain 21%<br />
Ron Paul 19%<br />
Mike Huckabee 6%<br />
Undecided 2%</p>
<p>I think the fun point of interest is Ron Paul&#8217;s point spread over Mike Huckabee. That&#8217;s got to be painful for the Huckabillies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/02/02/romney-handily-wins-maine-caucuses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John McCain (RINO-AZ)</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/01/30/john-mccain-rino-az/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/01/30/john-mccain-rino-az/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trenton Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/01/30/john-mccain-rino-az/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was listening to Laura Ingraham this morning when she played audio of McCain and Hillary being interviewed by Tim Russert while they were in Iraq. Russert asked the two of them if each thought the other would make a good President. Of course, they both laughed and talked about both getting into trouble, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was listening to Laura Ingraham this morning when she played audio of McCain and Hillary being interviewed by Tim Russert while they were in Iraq. Russert asked the two of them if each thought the other would make a good President.<br />
<span id="more-33"></span><br />
Of course, they both laughed and talked about both getting into trouble, but then McCain offered this:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I think Sen. Clinton would make a good President. Of course, I&#8217;m a Republican and so I would have to support a Republican nominee, but I think Sen. Clinton would make a good President.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>By contrast, Hillary said she thought McCain would make a good President, but she offered no apologies for having to support the Democratic nominee.</p>
<p>In case you missed it, if McCain has to explain that he has to support the Republican because of his own Republicanism, then he is no Republican at all. He is merely playing the role and is trying to pass himself off as something he is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/01/30/john-mccain-rino-az/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It just makes no sense</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/01/10/it-just-makes-no-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/01/10/it-just-makes-no-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trenton Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/01/10/it-just-makes-no-sense/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So many have stated that Mitt Romney should not be elected because of his alleged flip-flopping. Nevermind that most all of those charges can be easily answered with a little research. So, instead they vote for either John McCain or Mike Huckabee with the full expectation that these two will change their positions on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many have stated that Mitt Romney should not be elected because of his alleged flip-flopping. Nevermind that most all of those charges can be easily answered with a little research.</p>
<p>So, instead they vote for either John McCain or Mike Huckabee with the full expectation that these two will change their positions on the issues on which they currently disagree with Conservatives.</p>
<p>So, rather than vote for someone who has already changed their positions to largely match their own, they would prefer to elect someone that they hope will do so, but of which hope they have no evidence nor record.</p>
<p>It just doesn&#8217;t make any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conservativefront.com/2008/01/10/it-just-makes-no-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

